GQGU vs. PCLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG).

GQGU and PCLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025. PCLG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Sep 29, 2025.

Performance

GQGU vs. PCLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GQGU vs. PCLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	8.19%	-1.79%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	-17.09%	-1.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than PCLG's -17.09% return.

GQGU

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCLG

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -5.18%
• YTD: -17.09%
• 6M: -18.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. PCLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GQGU and PCLG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

GQGU

GQG US Equity ETF

PCLG

Polen Focus Growth ETF

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. PCLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQGU	PCLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	-1.90	+2.92

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and PCLG is -0.21. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

GQGU vs. PCLG - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than PCLG's 0.04% yield.

	TTM	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.94%	1.02%
PCLG Polen Focus Growth ETF	0.04%	0.03%

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. PCLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum PCLG drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and PCLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQGU	PCLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-23.78%	+17.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-20.73%	+17.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-8.18%	+5.97%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQGU	PCLG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	17.32%	-7.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	17.32%	-7.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	17.32%	-7.66%