GQGU vs. ANEW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and ANEW (ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GQGU is actively managed, while ANEW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ANEW.

Performance

GQGU vs. ANEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQGU achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than ANEW's 2.41% return.

GQGU

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 7.74%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ANEW

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQGU vs. ANEW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	7.74%	-1.14%
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	2.41%	0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GQGU and ANEW is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

GQGU vs. ANEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW

ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 16
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQGU vs. ANEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GQGU	ANEW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.28	+0.45

Drawdowns

GQGU vs. ANEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -6.65%, smaller than the maximum ANEW drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and ANEW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQGU	ANEW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-39.87%	+33.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.12%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-2.58%	-1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-13.38%	+10.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GQGU	ANEW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.10%	13.19%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.10%	18.81%	-8.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.10%	18.80%	-8.70%

GQGU vs. ANEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ANEW's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQGU vs. ANEW - Dividend Comparison

GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than ANEW's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	0.61%	0.54%	1.08%	0.87%	1.05%	0.24%	0.04%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.95%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQGU and ANEW in my portfolio?

GQGU and ANEW have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GQGU or ANEW?

On fees, ANEW is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQGU or ANEW?

ANEW is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQGU or ANEW?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.61% for ANEW.

What is the main difference between GQGU and ANEW?

They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.45% for ANEW.