GQGU vs. VUG
GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GQGU is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past year, GQGU returned 4.92% vs 17.55% for VUG. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. GQGU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
GQGU vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GQGU having a 6.11% return and VUG slightly higher at 6.19%.
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 21.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.61%
GQGU vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.11% | -1.12% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 6.19% | 10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GQGU and VUG is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GQGU vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VUG
GQGU vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GQGU | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GQGU vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQGU drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQGU and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQGU | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -50.68% | +42.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -16.53% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -4.48% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -7.08% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility
GQGU vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GQGU | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 17.18% | -6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.74% | 22.44% | -11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.74% | 21.51% | -10.77% |
GQGU vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQGU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GQGU vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
GQGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GQGU and VUG have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, VUG leads with 17.55% vs 4.92% for GQGU. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.55% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
They also come from different issuers: GQG Partners and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for GQGU and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for GQGU and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer