GPCR vs. HYMC
GPCR (Structure Therapeutics Inc. American Depositary Shares) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. GPCR operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, GPCR returned 15.87%/yr vs 94.60%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GPCR vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPCR achieves a -34.42% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's -2.65% return.
GPCR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 16.38%
- YTD
- -34.42%
- 6M
- -36.02%
- 1Y
- 106.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMC
- 1D
- -7.62%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -14.74%
- 1Y
- 618.63%
- 3Y*
- 94.60%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
GPCR vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPCR Structure Therapeutics Inc. American Depositary Shares | -34.42% | 156.45% | -33.46% | 63.04% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -2.65% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -58.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPCR and HYMC is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
GPCR:
$3.30B
HYMC:
$2.08B
GPCR:
-$2.75
HYMC:
-$1.64
GPCR:
2.28
HYMC:
9.28
GPCR:
$0.00
HYMC:
$0.00
GPCR:
$0.00
HYMC:
-$4.65M
GPCR:
-$191.27M
HYMC:
-$69.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPCR vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
GPCR
HYMC
GPCR vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Structure Therapeutics Inc. American Depositary Shares (GPCR) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GPCR | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.49 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 10.62 | -8.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 26.61 | -23.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GPCR vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPCR drawdown since its inception was -80.96%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPCR and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPCR | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.96% | -98.89% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.74% | -58.77% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.96% | -63.45% | -17.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.37% | -85.37% | +34.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.14% | -63.42% | +21.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.48% | 23.42% | +7.06% |
Volatility
GPCR vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Structure Therapeutics Inc. American Depositary Shares (GPCR) is 13.41%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 25.09%. This indicates that GPCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GPCR | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.41% | 25.09% | -11.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.46% | 95.57% | -53.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.06% | 118.24% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 98.46% | 152.76% | -54.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 98.46% | 122.88% | -24.42% |
Dividends
GPCR vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither GPCR nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GPCR vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Structure Therapeutics Inc. American Depositary Shares and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GPCR and HYMC have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (25.09%) compared to GPCR (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GPCR dropped -80.96% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.28 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GPCR and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer