HYMC vs. RLMD
HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) and RLMD (Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while RLMD operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, HYMC returned -3.24%/yr vs -26.81%/yr for RLMD. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HYMC vs. RLMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 35.25% return, which is significantly higher than RLMD's 31.06% return.
HYMC
- 1D
- -4.94%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- 35.25%
- 6M
- 181.03%
- 1Y
- 771.27%
- 3Y*
- 112.13%
- 5Y*
- -3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
RLMD
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -14.57%
- YTD
- 31.06%
- 6M
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 807.79%
- 3Y*
- 30.78%
- 5Y*
- -26.81%
- 10Y*
- -5.41%
HYMC vs. RLMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | 35.25% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.02% |
RLMD Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. | 31.06% | 828.85% | -87.44% | 18.62% | -84.51% | -29.75% | -17.77% | 747.83% | 69.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYMC and RLMD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018 | 0.10 |
The correlation between HYMC and RLMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HYMC:
$2.89B
RLMD:
$548.16M
HYMC:
-$1.64
RLMD:
-$1.06
HYMC:
12.89
RLMD:
2.51
HYMC:
$0.00
RLMD:
$0.00
HYMC:
-$4.65M
RLMD:
$0.00
HYMC:
-$69.17M
RLMD:
-$60.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYMC vs. RLMD — Risk / Return Rank
HYMC
RLMD
HYMC vs. RLMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. (RLMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYMC | RLMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.61 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.87 | 22.80 | -5.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.61 | 52.37 | -16.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYMC | RLMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.56 | 6.63 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | -0.23 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | -0.16 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
HYMC vs. RLMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum RLMD drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and RLMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYMC | RLMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -99.66% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.18% | -35.78% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -96.30% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.39% | -99.32% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.68% | -91.49% | +11.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.32% | -79.70% | +16.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.83% | 15.55% | +6.28% |
Volatility
HYMC vs. RLMD - Volatility Comparison
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 25.82% compared to Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. (RLMD) at 20.16%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYMC | RLMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.82% | 20.16% | +5.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.62% | 69.51% | +24.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.80% | 123.06% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.42% | 116.20% | +36.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.02% | 114.27% | +8.75% |
Dividends
HYMC vs. RLMD - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYMC nor RLMD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HYMC vs. RLMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation and Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HYMC and RLMD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (25.82%) compared to RLMD (20.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs RLMD's -99.66%.
RLMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.63 vs 6.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYMC and RLMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer