PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMC vs. CAD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and USD/CAD (CAD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
47.45%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.02%
CAD=X
USD/CAD
0.09%-0.01%0.01%0.02%-0.04%-0.17%0.28%-0.17%0.07%
Different Trading Currencies

HYMC is traded in USD, while CAD=X is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CAD=X values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 47.45% return, which is significantly higher than CAD=X's 0.09% return.


HYMC

1D
-0.43%
1M
-37.12%
YTD
47.45%
6M
435.11%
1Y
1,068.33%
3Y*
100.88%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*

CAD=X

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.08%
1Y
0.04%
3Y*
0.00%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
0.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMC vs. CAD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CAD=X
CAD=X Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CAD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and USD/CAD (CAD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMCCAD=XDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

9.12

0.04

+9.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.90

0.06

+4.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.01

+0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.26

0.34

+20.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

55.79

0.55

+55.24

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 9.12, which is higher than the CAD=X Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and CAD=X, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMCCAD=XDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.12

0.04

+9.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.01

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.00

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and CAD=X is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than CAD=X's maximum drawdown of -11.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and CAD=X.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMCCAD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-23.90%

-74.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.18%

-5.43%

-40.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.83%

-8.31%

-87.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.84%

-5.55%

-72.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.04%

-11.00%

-52.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.60%

1.87%

+15.73%

Volatility

HYMC vs. CAD=X - Volatility Comparison

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a higher volatility of 36.09% compared to USD/CAD (CAD=X) at 0.19%. This indicates that HYMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYMCCAD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.09%

0.19%

+35.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.91%

0.50%

+96.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.74%

0.98%

+117.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.45%

0.83%

+151.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.72%

1.80%

+121.92%