PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMC vs. AGQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMC vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMC achieves a 27.56% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -29.18% return.


HYMC

1D
-5.69%
1M
-14.28%
YTD
27.56%
6M
153.30%
1Y
710.70%
3Y*
107.66%
5Y*
-4.36%
10Y*

AGQ

1D
2.38%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-29.18%
6M
1.31%
1Y
149.89%
3Y*
55.60%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
11.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMC vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
27.56%975.57%-9.80%-53.96%-13.30%-92.18%-24.03%4.59%3.02%
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-29.18%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMC and AGQ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.36

The correlation between HYMC and AGQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMC vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMC vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMCAGQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.33

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.54

1.98

+13.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.53

3.75

+28.78

HYMC vs. AGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMC Sharpe Ratio is 6.03, which is higher than the AGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMC and AGQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMCAGQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.03

1.25

+4.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.21

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.08

-0.19

Drawdowns

HYMC vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMC drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMC and AGQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMCAGQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-98.16%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.18%

-76.21%

+30.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.45%

-76.21%

+12.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.39%

-76.21%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.83%

-84.96%

+4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.33%

-79.86%

+16.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.02%

40.19%

-18.17%

Volatility

HYMC vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is 26.33%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.59%. This indicates that HYMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMCAGQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.33%

33.59%

-7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.82%

133.69%

-39.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.91%

120.79%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

152.44%

74.68%

+77.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

123.01%

65.65%

+57.36%

Dividends

HYMC vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYMC nor AGQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMC and AGQ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (33.59%) compared to HYMC (26.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMC dropped -98.89% vs AGQ's -98.16%.

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMC and AGQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer