GK vs. SPYG
GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. GK is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GK returned 2.34%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
GK vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GK having a 12.37% return and SPYG slightly higher at 12.43%.
GK
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.85%
SPYG
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 25.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.34K | $30.78K | $45.67K | |
| $323.67M | $273.71M | $308.17M |
GK vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 12.37% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 12.43% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between GK and SPYG is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GK and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
GK vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GK
SPYG
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GK
SPYG
Industrials
GK
SPYG
Communication Services
GK
SPYG
Healthcare
GK
SPYG
Financial Services
GK
SPYG
Utilities
GK
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
GK
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
GK
SPYG
Basic Materials
GK
-
SPYG
Energy
GK
-
SPYG
Real Estate
GK
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GK vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
GK
SPYG
GK vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.78 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 6.45 | -2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GK vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.72% | -67.63% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -13.76% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -22.14% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.72% | -32.67% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.59% | -2.28% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -24.20% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.78% | +0.66% |
Volatility
GK vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.35%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 6.35% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.42% | 14.96% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 18.23% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 21.53% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 20.81% | +3.20% |
GK vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
GK vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SPYG's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, GK and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GK has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to SPYG (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 13.61% vs 2.34% for GK. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GK.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.07% for GK.
GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GK and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer