GK vs. VOO
GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. GK is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GK returned 2.46%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
GK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GK having a 10.37% return and VOO slightly lower at 10.16%.
GK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.57K | $31.19K | $45.15K | |
| $3.82B | $3.78B | $5.44B |
GK vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 10.37% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.16% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GK and VOO is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GK and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
GK vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GK
VOO
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GK
VOO
Industrials
GK
VOO
Communication Services
GK
VOO
Healthcare
GK
VOO
Financial Services
GK
VOO
Utilities
GK
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
GK
VOO
Consumer Defensive
GK
VOO
Basic Materials
GK
-
VOO
Energy
GK
-
VOO
Real Estate
GK
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GK vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GK
VOO
GK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.21 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 9.44 | -6.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.72% | -33.99% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -8.90% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -18.69% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.72% | -24.52% | -23.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -1.38% | -4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.37% | -3.67% | -19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 2.08% | +2.36% |
Volatility
GK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GK | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 3.54% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 10.10% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 12.82% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 16.93% | +7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 18.01% | +5.99% |
GK vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.07% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GK and VOO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GK has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 2.46% for GK. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GK.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.07% for GK.
GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GK and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer