GK vs. QPX
GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GK returned 19.50%/yr vs 20.52%/yr for QPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QPX.
Performance
GK vs. QPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 16.38% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's 9.57% return.
GK
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 30.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- —
GK vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 16.38% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 9.57% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GK and QPX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GK and QPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GK vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank
GK
QPX
GK vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GK | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.68 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 10.38 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GK vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and QPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GK | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.72% | -34.74% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -11.56% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -17.89% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.82% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -8.02% | -15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.98% | +1.05% |
Volatility
GK vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) at 6.22%. This indicates that GK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GK | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 6.22% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.75% | 12.26% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 15.00% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 20.07% | +3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 20.06% | +3.94% |
GK vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
GK vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison
GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GK and QPX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GK has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to QPX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs QPX's -34.74%.
On 3-year performance, QPX leads with 20.52% vs 19.50% for GK. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QPX has performed better with a 20.52% return vs 19.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 1.46% for QPX.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GK and QPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer