GK vs. DWUS
GK (AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF) and DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GK returned 2.46%/yr vs 9.13%/yr for DWUS. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GK charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for DWUS.
Performance
GK vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GK achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than DWUS's 6.13% return.
GK
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
DWUS
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.53K | $18.52K | $88.59K | |
| $30.57K | $31.19K | $45.15K |
GK vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 10.37% | 17.78% | 20.10% | 21.19% | -42.76% | 4.61% |
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 6.13% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GK and DWUS is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GK and DWUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
GK vs. DWUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GK
DWUS
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GK
DWUS
Industrials
GK
DWUS
Communication Services
GK
DWUS
Healthcare
GK
DWUS
Financial Services
GK
DWUS
Utilities
GK
DWUS
Consumer Cyclical
GK
DWUS
Consumer Defensive
GK
DWUS
Basic Materials
GK
-
DWUS
Energy
GK
-
DWUS
Real Estate
GK
-
DWUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GK vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank
GK
DWUS
GK vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GK | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.92 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 3.26 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GK vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GK drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than DWUS's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GK and DWUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GK | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.72% | -30.47% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.13% | -14.35% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.62% | -19.63% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.72% | -26.45% | -21.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -10.02% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.37% | -6.82% | -16.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 4.06% | +0.38% |
Volatility
GK vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is 7.00%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that GK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GK | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 8.91% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 17.97% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 20.62% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 19.61% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.00% | 22.60% | +1.40% |
GK vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
GK vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison
GK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than DWUS's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
GK AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.30% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, GK and DWUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DWUS has higher volatility (8.91%) compared to GK (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GK dropped -47.72% vs DWUS's -30.47%.
On 5-year performance, DWUS leads with 9.13% vs 2.46% for GK. On fees, GK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GK has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DWUS has performed better with a 9.13% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for DWUS.
GK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.03% for DWUS.
GK is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DWUS is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GK and 1.17% for DWUS.
GK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GK and DWUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer