GIS vs. VEA
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) is a stock, while VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.58%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for VEA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 11.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of -2.58%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 14.39%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -15.22%
- 1Y
- -20.32%
- 3Y*
- -17.57%
- 5Y*
- -4.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.03%
GIS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -15.22% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 11.59% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and VEA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.28 |
The correlation between GIS and VEA shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
VEA
GIS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.28 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.23 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 8.35 | -9.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -60.68% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -11.63% | -22.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -13.45% | -40.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -29.71% | -29.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -35.73% | -23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.03% | -4.37% | -47.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -13.22% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.80% | 3.09% | +14.71% |
Volatility
GIS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.31%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.90% | 5.31% | +7.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.53% | 15.14% | +6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 17.09% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 16.78% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 17.18% | +5.24% |
Dividends
GIS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.49% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and VEA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to VEA (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer