PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GIS vs. TR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GISTR
YTD Return10.39%-7.99%
1Y Return-17.64%-18.87%
3Y Return (Ann)7.98%1.84%
5Y Return (Ann)10.20%-1.42%
10Y Return (Ann)6.44%4.77%
Sharpe Ratio-0.97-0.92
Daily Std Dev18.30%21.52%
Max Drawdown-45.08%-46.80%
Current Drawdown-19.26%-32.67%

Fundamentals


GISTR
Market Cap$39.99B$2.14B
EPS$4.36$1.32
PE Ratio16.2522.59
PEG Ratio1.980.00
Revenue (TTM)$20.17B$769.36M
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.55B$232.73M
EBITDA (TTM)$4.30B$135.50M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between GIS and TR is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GIS vs. TR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than TR's -7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed TR with an annualized return of 6.44%, while TR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


6,000.00%6,500.00%7,000.00%7,500.00%8,000.00%8,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8,320.74%
6,085.50%
GIS
TR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


General Mills, Inc.

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. TR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.77
TR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TR, currently valued at -0.92, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TR, currently valued at -1.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.28
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TR, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.86
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TR, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TR, currently valued at -1.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.18

GIS vs. TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which roughly equals the TR Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GIS and TR.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.40-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.97
-0.92
GIS
TR

Dividends

GIS vs. TR - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than TR's 1.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.34%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
1.19%1.08%0.85%0.99%1.21%1.09%1.10%0.98%0.87%1.17%1.02%1.07%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, roughly equal to the maximum TR drawdown of -46.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and TR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.26%
-32.67%
GIS
TR

Volatility

GIS vs. TR - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) at 3.88%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.81%
3.88%
GIS
TR

Financials

GIS vs. TR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items