PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TR vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TR vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TR vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
21.28%17.87%1.36%-18.76%22.25%27.01%-12.02%3.23%14.07%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.22%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 21.28% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's -4.22% return.


TR

1D
0.75%
1M
3.38%
YTD
21.28%
6M
5.67%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
5.16%

NTSX

1D
0.38%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TR vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR
TR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TR Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TR vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

0.89

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

1.30

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.52

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

6.52

-1.24

TR vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TR Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.89

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.48

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.62

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between TR and NTSX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TR vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NTSX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
0.82%0.98%1.11%1.08%0.85%0.99%1.21%1.05%1.08%0.99%0.91%1.11%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TR vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and NTSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-31.34%

-13.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.03%

-11.13%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-31.34%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.04%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-6.92%

-9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

2.60%

+5.39%

Volatility

TR vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) have volatilities of 6.31% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.11%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

9.65%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.47%

18.38%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.77%

17.04%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.12%

18.38%

+6.74%