TR vs. PM
TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — TR in Confectioners, PM in Tobacco. Over the past 10 years, TR returned 3.78%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for PM. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TR vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 3.78%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.80%
PM
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 30.23%
- 5Y*
- 19.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12B | $967.33M | $937.11M | |
| $6.32M | $6.99M | $8.92M |
TR vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 10.22% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 21.02% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and PM is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
TR:
$2.93B
PM:
$297.41B
TR:
$1.35
PM:
$6.97
TR:
28.82
PM:
27.38
TR:
2.43
PM:
2.98
TR:
3.90
PM:
7.00
TR:
$735.61M
PM:
$42.55B
TR:
$257.59M
PM:
$28.72B
TR:
$138.31M
PM:
$18.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
TR
PM
TR vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TR | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.11 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 2.44 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TR vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, roughly equal to the maximum PM drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -42.87% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -18.54% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.03% | -20.64% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -22.78% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -42.87% | +6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.71% | -4.67% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -9.97% | -6.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.21% | 8.42% | +1.79% |
Volatility
TR vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is 9.00%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TR | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 10.17% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | 22.50% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.66% | 27.90% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 23.19% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 24.64% | +0.78% |
Dividends
TR vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than PM's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.08% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
Financials
TR vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TR vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
TR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.77M and revenue of 151.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.66B and revenue of 11.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
TR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.21M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 4.53B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.5%.
TR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 17.66M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TR and PM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to TR (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TR dropped -44.74% vs PM's -42.87%.
PM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TR and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer