PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TR vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TR vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TR vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
20.38%17.87%1.36%-18.76%22.25%27.01%-12.02%3.23%-7.18%-4.77%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.05%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 5.08%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.67% annualized return.


TR

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.41%
YTD
20.38%
6M
5.66%
1Y
41.08%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
5.08%

BND

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TR vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TR
TR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TR vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.99

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.41

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.18

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

1.81

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

4.98

+0.26

TR vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TR Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.99

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.04

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.30

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between TR and BND is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TR vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BND's 3.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.
0.82%0.98%1.11%1.08%0.85%0.99%1.21%1.05%1.08%0.99%0.91%1.11%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.91%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Drawdowns

TR vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and BND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-18.58%

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.03%

-2.44%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-17.91%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.41%

-18.58%

-17.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-2.58%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-3.07%

-13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

0.89%

+7.10%

Volatility

TR vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that TR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.72%

1.63%

+5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.67%

2.52%

+16.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.46%

4.30%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.77%

6.00%

+18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.13%

5.52%

+19.61%