TR vs. BND
TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, TR returned 3.28%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BND. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TR vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 3.28%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
TR vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 6.12% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and BND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | -0.08 |
The correlation between TR and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
TR
BND
TR vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.36 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 2.03 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.24 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.92 | -1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 5.80 | -4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.36 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.01 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.29 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.59 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
TR vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -18.58% | -26.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -2.68% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.32% | -5.92% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -17.91% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -18.58% | -17.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.96% | -2.37% | -13.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.76% | -3.06% | -13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 0.88% | +7.77% |
Volatility
TR vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that TR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TR | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 1.23% | +8.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 2.66% | +13.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.33% | 3.78% | +22.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 6.02% | +18.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 5.53% | +19.75% |
Dividends
TR vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.94% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TR and BND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TR has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TR dropped -44.74% vs BND's -18.58%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TR and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer