GIS vs. LW
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 5 years, GIS returned -7.83%/yr vs -9.85%/yr for LW. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -23.47% return, which is significantly lower than LW's 10.21% return.
GIS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -33.38%
- 3Y*
- -21.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
LW
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -16.94%
- 3Y*
- -25.00%
- 5Y*
- -9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
GIS vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -23.47% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 10.21% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and LW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016 | 0.29 |
The correlation between GIS and LW shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$18.72B
LW:
$6.32B
GIS:
$4.08
LW:
$2.15
GIS:
8.45
LW:
21.09
GIS:
3.64
LW:
0.29
GIS:
1.02
LW:
0.97
GIS:
2.00
LW:
3.46
GIS:
$18.37B
LW:
$6.52B
GIS:
$4.70B
LW:
$1.34B
GIS:
$3.03B
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
LW
GIS vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.96 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.41 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.86 | -0.71 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -64.56% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.85% | -41.37% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.32% | -64.56% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -64.56% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.70% | -57.84% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -21.32% | +11.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.06% | 24.00% | -4.94% |
Volatility
GIS vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 6.25%, while Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 9.19% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.81% | 38.28% | -19.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.96% | 44.27% | -20.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 37.84% | -16.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 35.87% | -13.77% |
Dividends
GIS vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than LW's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.07% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.31% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and LW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LW has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs LW's -64.56%.
LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer