PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LW vs. MDLZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LW and MDLZ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

LW vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.16%
-7.98%
LW
MDLZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LW:

-0.57

MDLZ:

-0.78

Sortino Ratio

LW:

-0.47

MDLZ:

-1.05

Omega Ratio

LW:

0.90

MDLZ:

0.88

Calmar Ratio

LW:

-0.48

MDLZ:

-0.65

Martin Ratio

LW:

-0.95

MDLZ:

-1.46

Ulcer Index

LW:

27.16%

MDLZ:

9.22%

Daily Std Dev

LW:

44.84%

MDLZ:

17.13%

Max Drawdown

LW:

-53.32%

MDLZ:

-38.16%

Current Drawdown

LW:

-30.37%

MDLZ:

-20.59%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LW:

$11.72B

MDLZ:

$82.02B

EPS

LW:

$4.26

MDLZ:

$2.82

PE Ratio

LW:

19.30

MDLZ:

21.75

PEG Ratio

LW:

2.77

MDLZ:

4.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$4.72B

MDLZ:

$36.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.17B

MDLZ:

$13.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$852.70M

MDLZ:

$7.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a -26.27% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's -15.56% return.


LW

YTD

-26.27%

1M

1.82%

6M

-6.63%

1Y

-24.76%

5Y*

-0.45%

10Y*

N/A

MDLZ

YTD

-15.56%

1M

-5.98%

6M

-8.13%

1Y

-13.41%

5Y*

3.98%

10Y*

7.10%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LW vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.57-0.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.47-1.05
The chart of Omega ratio for LW, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.900.88
The chart of Calmar ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.48-0.65
The chart of Martin ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.95-1.46
LW
MDLZ

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and MDLZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.57
-0.78
LW
MDLZ

Dividends

LW vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than MDLZ's 2.91% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
1.84%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.91%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%1.90%

Drawdowns

LW vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -38.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and MDLZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-30.37%
-20.59%
LW
MDLZ

Volatility

LW vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 5.09%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10.71%
5.09%
LW
MDLZ

Financials

LW vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab