PortfoliosLab logo
LW vs. MDLZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LW and MDLZ is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

LW vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
92.40%
89.46%
LW
MDLZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LW:

-0.74

MDLZ:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

LW:

-0.77

MDLZ:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

LW:

0.86

MDLZ:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

LW:

-0.65

MDLZ:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

LW:

-1.41

MDLZ:

-0.40

Ulcer Index

LW:

25.95%

MDLZ:

11.86%

Daily Std Dev

LW:

49.44%

MDLZ:

20.66%

Max Drawdown

LW:

-56.43%

MDLZ:

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

LW:

-53.49%

MDLZ:

-11.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LW:

$7.42B

MDLZ:

$84.88B

EPS

LW:

$2.55

MDLZ:

$3.42

PE Ratio

LW:

20.63

MDLZ:

19.16

PEG Ratio

LW:

2.05

MDLZ:

4.29

PS Ratio

LW:

1.16

MDLZ:

2.33

PB Ratio

LW:

4.54

MDLZ:

3.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$6.39B

MDLZ:

$27.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.44B

MDLZ:

$9.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$989.60M

MDLZ:

$4.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a -21.81% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 10.58% return.


LW

YTD

-21.81%

1M

-3.30%

6M

-31.75%

1Y

-36.47%

5Y*

-0.65%

10Y*

N/A

MDLZ

YTD

10.58%

1M

-0.42%

6M

-3.84%

1Y

-4.76%

5Y*

7.53%

10Y*

8.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LW vs. MDLZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LW is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LW is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LW is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LW is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LW is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LW is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDLZ is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LW vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LW: -0.74
MDLZ: -0.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LW: -0.77
MDLZ: -0.18
The chart of Omega ratio for LW, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LW: 0.86
MDLZ: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for LW, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LW: -0.65
MDLZ: -0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for LW, currently valued at -1.41, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LW: -1.41
MDLZ: -0.40

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and MDLZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.74
-0.23
LW
MDLZ

Dividends

LW vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, which matches MDLZ's 2.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
2.79%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.80%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%

Drawdowns

LW vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -46.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and MDLZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-53.49%
-11.92%
LW
MDLZ

Volatility

LW vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 8.00%. This indicates that LW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.91%
8.00%
LW
MDLZ

Financials

LW vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items