LW vs. AMSC
Compare and contrast key facts about Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC).
Performance
LW vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LW vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 1.72% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 17.62% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
Fundamentals
LW:
$5.90B
AMSC:
$1.52B
LW:
$2.80
AMSC:
$3.04
LW:
15.10
AMSC:
11.15
LW:
0.91
AMSC:
5.21
LW:
3.36
AMSC:
2.83
LW:
$6.47B
AMSC:
$279.40M
LW:
$1.43B
AMSC:
$85.47M
LW:
$1.02B
AMSC:
$20.09M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than AMSC's 17.62% return.
LW
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- -26.19%
- 1Y
- -18.47%
- 3Y*
- -24.54%
- 5Y*
- -9.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 6M
- -43.00%
- 1Y
- 86.60%
- 3Y*
- 90.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LW vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
LW
AMSC
LW vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LW | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 1.05 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | 1.69 | -1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.31 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 2.40 | -3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LW | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 1.05 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.14 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.05 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LW and AMSC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LW vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LW vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -63.28%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and AMSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LW | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.28% | -99.57% | +36.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.25% | -61.08% | +21.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.28% | -82.94% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.08% | -95.11% | +34.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.47% | -75.66% | +55.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.08% | 33.43% | -14.35% |
Volatility
LW vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is 10.82%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.49%. This indicates that LW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LW | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 22.49% | -11.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.99% | 69.27% | -32.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.05% | 83.04% | -37.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.42% | 88.39% | -50.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 78.69% | -42.87% |
Financials
LW vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities