PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LW vs. GPK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LW vs. GPK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than GPK's -27.74% return.


LW

1D
-2.26%
1M
-4.28%
YTD
1.05%
6M
-28.31%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
-26.76%
5Y*
-11.38%
10Y*

GPK

1D
-4.01%
1M
10.93%
YTD
-27.74%
6M
-32.72%
1Y
-49.46%
3Y*
-22.99%
5Y*
-8.25%
10Y*
-0.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LW vs. GPK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
1.05%-35.69%-37.01%22.32%42.89%-18.40%-7.23%18.27%31.81%51.77%
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
-27.74%-43.33%11.73%12.65%15.87%16.97%3.93%59.84%-29.60%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LW and GPK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LW:

$5.80B

GPK:

$3.19B

EPS

LW:

$2.15

GPK:

$0.92

PE Ratio

LW:

19.34

GPK:

11.71

PEG Ratio

LW:

0.27

GPK:

0.32

PS Ratio

LW:

0.89

GPK:

0.37

PB Ratio

LW:

3.17

GPK:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$6.52B

GPK:

$8.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.34B

GPK:

$1.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$893.90M

GPK:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LW vs. GPK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LW
LW Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GPK
GPK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GPK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
GPK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LW vs. GPK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LWGPKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

-1.17

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.42

-1.89

+1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.77

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.82

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.00

-1.38

+0.38

LW vs. GPK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is higher than the GPK Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and GPK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LWGPKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

-1.17

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.27

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.03

+0.11

Drawdowns

LW vs. GPK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum GPK drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and GPK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LWGPKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-98.11%

+33.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.37%

-61.23%

+19.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.56%

-69.71%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.56%

-69.71%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.34%

-63.41%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-57.13%

+35.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.25%

36.39%

-13.14%

Volatility

LW vs. GPK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is 10.58%, while Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that LW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LWGPKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

19.05%

-8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.23%

37.20%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.16%

42.36%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.84%

30.97%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.88%

29.41%

+6.47%

Dividends

LW vs. GPK - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than GPK's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
4.09%2.92%1.47%1.62%1.46%1.54%1.77%1.80%2.82%2.91%1.80%1.56%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.60%3.53%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LW vs. GPK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Graphic Packaging Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.56B
2.16B
(LW) Total Revenue
(GPK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LW vs. GPK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Graphic Packaging Holding Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.2%
0
Portfolio components
LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

GPK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

GPK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported an operating income of 19.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

GPK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graphic Packaging Holding Company reported a net income of -43.00M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LW and GPK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPK has higher volatility (19.05%) compared to LW (10.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LW dropped -64.56% vs GPK's -98.11%.

LW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.50 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LW and GPK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer