GIL vs. GLTR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) is a stock, while GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Over the past 10 years, GIL returned 9.52%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GIL vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 9.52%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.

GIL

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 33.46%
• 3Y*: 29.16%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

GLTR

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -13.34%
• YTD: -4.66%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 38.86%
• 3Y*: 29.97%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	-1.83%	35.08%	45.31%	23.58%	-33.93%	54.00%	-4.46%	-1.17%	-4.58%	29.00%
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	-4.66%	87.25%	20.63%	2.01%	-0.25%	-9.60%	29.52%	20.96%	-2.85%	12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and GLTR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010	0.12

Return for Risk

GIL vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL

GIL Risk / Return Rank: 67
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

GLTR

GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 30
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIL	GLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.04	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.39	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.22	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.17	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	2.88	-0.14

GIL vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIL vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and GLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIL	GLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.23%	-55.70%	-31.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.71%	-34.09%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.28%	-34.09%	+2.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-34.09%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.44%	-34.09%	-40.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.52%	-31.27%	+15.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-28.82%	+9.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.70%	13.86%	-3.16%

Volatility

GIL vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) have volatilities of 10.74% and 10.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIL	GLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.74%	10.43%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.40%	36.24%	-9.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.65%	38.40%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.13%	23.87%	+8.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.61%	20.64%	+13.97%

Dividends

GIL vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	1.56%	1.45%	1.74%	2.25%	2.47%	1.53%	0.55%	1.82%	1.48%	1.16%	1.23%	0.91%
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIL and GLTR in my portfolio?

GIL and GLTR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIL or GLTR?

GIL has higher volatility (10.74%) compared to GLTR (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.