GIL vs. ATZ.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO).

Performance

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	-10.52%	35.08%	45.31%	23.58%	-33.93%	54.00%	-4.46%	-1.17%	-4.58%	29.00%
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	-4.50%	130.12%	78.98%	-40.60%	-15.60%	104.49%	38.09%	21.96%	19.20%	-22.48%

Different Trading Currencies

GIL is traded in USD, while ATZ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATZ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GIL : $8.92B ATZ.TO : CA$13.59B
EPS GIL : $2.60 ATZ.TO : CA$2.92
PE Ratio GIL : 21.43 ATZ.TO : 38.91
PS Ratio GIL : 2.36 ATZ.TO : 3.96
PB Ratio GIL : 2.51 ATZ.TO : 10.13
Total Revenue (TTM) GIL : $3.63B ATZ.TO : CA$3.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) GIL : $1.13B ATZ.TO : CA$1.52B
EBITDA (TTM) GIL : $835.39M ATZ.TO : CA$635.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly lower than ATZ.TO's -4.50% return.

GIL

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: -17.92%
• YTD: -10.52%
• 6M: -2.92%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 21.22%
• 5Y*: 14.60%
• 10Y*: 7.82%

ATZ.TO

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: -7.76%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: 35.02%
• 1Y: 132.20%
• 3Y*: 36.53%
• 5Y*: 26.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GIL vs. ATZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL

GIL Risk / Return Rank: 67
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

ATZ.TO

ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIL	ATZ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	2.71	-1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	3.07	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.49	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	5.00	-3.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	15.31	-11.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and ATZ.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIL	ATZ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	2.71	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.56	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.47	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and ATZ.TO is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.	1.67%	1.45%	1.74%	2.25%	2.47%	1.53%	0.55%	1.82%	1.48%	1.16%	1.23%	0.91%
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than ATZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and ATZ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIL	ATZ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.23%	-64.82%	-22.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.71%	-26.02%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.97%	-64.82%	+26.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.00%	-17.59%	-5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.13%	-20.46%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.94%	9.05%	-2.11%

Volatility

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) is 9.60%, while Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that GIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIL	ATZ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	13.74%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.17%	28.23%	-7.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.11%	49.03%	-14.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.34%	47.98%	-16.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.16%	44.89%	-10.73%

Financials

GIL vs. ATZ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Aritzia Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 308.45M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

ATZ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 471.80M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.

GIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 188.62M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

ATZ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 169.65M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

GIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of 56.98M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

ATZ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 138.89M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.