GIL vs. F
GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) and F (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — GIL in Apparel Manufacturing, F in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, GIL returned 8.61%/yr vs 6.87%/yr for F. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIL vs. F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than F's 22.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has outperformed F with an annualized return of 8.61%, while F has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.
GIL
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
F
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- 38.33%
- YTD
- 22.56%
- 6M
- 22.84%
- 1Y
- 61.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
GIL vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | -6.03% | 35.08% | 45.31% | 23.58% | -33.93% | 54.00% | -4.46% | -1.17% | -4.58% | 29.00% |
F Ford Motor Company | 22.56% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIL and F is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1998 | 0.31 |
The correlation between GIL and F shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIL:
$10.77B
F:
$63.96B
GIL:
$1.54
F:
-$1.52
GIL:
2.30
F:
0.33
GIL:
3.16
F:
1.71
GIL:
$4.09B
F:
$189.86B
GIL:
$1.18B
F:
$17.42B
GIL:
$631.40M
F:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIL vs. F — Risk / Return Rank
GIL
F
GIL vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIL | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.32 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.78 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.65 | 7.48 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIL | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.68 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.12 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.18 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.16 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
GIL vs. F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIL | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.23% | -97.07% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.71% | -22.31% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.28% | -36.51% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | -58.62% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.44% | -64.77% | -9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.13% | -30.68% | +11.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.13% | -44.70% | +25.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | 8.29% | +1.95% |
Volatility
GIL vs. F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) is 9.88%, while Ford Motor Company (F) has a volatility of 21.29%. This indicates that GIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIL | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 21.29% | -11.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.56% | 29.05% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.08% | 37.02% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.00% | 39.38% | -7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 37.46% | -2.91% |
Dividends
GIL vs. F - Dividend Comparison
GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than F's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 3.82% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | 1.63% | 1.45% | 1.74% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 1.53% | 0.55% | 1.82% | 1.48% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 0.91% |
Financials
GIL vs. F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIL vs. F - Profitability Comparison
GIL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.35M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
GIL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 59.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
GIL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of -65.79M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -5.6%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIL and F have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
F has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to GIL (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs F's -97.07%.
F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIL and F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer