PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIL vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GIL vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 23.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GIL has outperformed MO with an annualized return of 8.61%, while MO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.


GIL

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.75%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
2.26%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
8.61%

MO

1D
1.53%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
23.96%
6M
24.61%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
7.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
-6.03%35.08%45.31%23.58%-33.93%54.00%-4.46%-1.17%-4.58%29.00%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
23.96%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL and MO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1998

0.16

The correlation between GIL and MO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIL:

$10.77B

MO:

$117.61B

EPS

GIL:

$1.54

MO:

$4.79

PE Ratio

GIL:

37.76

MO:

14.66

PS Ratio

GIL:

2.30

MO:

5.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIL:

$4.09B

MO:

$21.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIL:

$1.18B

MO:

$14.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIL:

$631.40M

MO:

$11.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIL vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL
GIL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.51

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

3.82

-1.17

GIL vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the MO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.10

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.69

-0.17

Drawdowns

GIL vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-65.43%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

-16.40%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.28%

-16.40%

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-25.83%

-12.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.44%

-53.69%

-20.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.13%

-5.70%

-13.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.13%

-11.93%

-7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.24%

6.48%

+3.76%

Volatility

GIL vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) has a higher volatility of 9.88% compared to Altria Group, Inc. (MO) at 7.41%. This indicates that GIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

7.41%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

17.18%

+8.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.08%

22.42%

+11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.00%

20.63%

+11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

22.94%

+11.61%

Dividends

GIL vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than MO's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
1.63%1.45%1.74%2.25%2.47%1.53%0.55%1.82%1.48%1.16%1.23%0.91%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.97%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

GIL vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.17B
5.43B
(GIL) Total Revenue
(MO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIL vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gildan Activewear Inc. and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
23.9%
64.6%
Portfolio components
GIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a gross profit of 278.35M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

GIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported an operating income of 59.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

GIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gildan Activewear Inc. reported a net income of -65.79M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -5.6%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIL and MO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIL has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to MO (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs MO's -65.43%.

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIL and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer