GGUS vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
GGUS and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both GGUS and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GGUS vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGUS vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | -8.81% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.83% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 4.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a -8.81% return, which is significantly higher than IWF's -9.83% return.
GGUS
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -8.81%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWF
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGUS vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GGUS vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank
GGUS
IWF
GGUS vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGUS | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 3.95 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGUS | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.36 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGUS and IWF is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGUS vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than IWF's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
GGUS vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and IWF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGUS | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -64.25% | +41.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -16.27% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -13.12% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -22.21% | +18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 4.74% | -0.44% |
Volatility
GGUS vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) have volatilities of 6.60% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGUS | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 6.74% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 12.36% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.80% | 22.40% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 21.41% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 20.92% | -1.63% |