GGUS vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GGUS is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past year, GGUS returned 17.87% vs -3.86% for CCOR. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. GGUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

GGUS vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGUS achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -2.72% return.

GGUS

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -2.70%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 17.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -2.72%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: -3.86%
• 3Y*: -1.69%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGUS vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	3.10%	17.32%	30.88%	4.54%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-2.72%	3.52%	-5.70%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GGUS and CCOR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	-0.16

GGUS vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GGUS	CCOR
Technology	48.7%	15.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	8.8%
Communication Services	9.7%	8.3%
Healthcare	9.5%	11.2%
Industrials	6.5%	9.1%
Financial Services	6.5%	18.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	7.0%
Utilities	1.3%	6.2%
Real Estate	0.6%	2.8%
Energy	0.5%	7.9%
Basic Materials	0.4%	4.9%

Return for Risk

GGUS vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGUS

GGUS Risk / Return Rank: 31
GGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
GGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGUS vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGUS	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	-0.51	+1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	-0.66	+2.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.92	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	-0.44	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	-0.94	+5.00

GGUS vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGUS and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGUS vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGUS drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGUS and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGUS	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-22.99%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.91%	-8.79%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-19.21%	+13.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.21%	-7.35%	+4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	4.10%	+0.32%

Volatility

GGUS vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.51%. This indicates that GGUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGUS	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	3.51%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	5.62%	+6.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	7.56%	+8.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	11.15%	+7.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	10.77%	+8.29%

GGUS vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGUS vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

GGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than CCOR's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.02%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF	0.43%	0.43%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGUS and CCOR in my portfolio?

GGUS and CCOR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGUS or CCOR?

GGUS has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to CCOR (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGUS dropped -22.59% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, GGUS or CCOR?

On 1-year performance, GGUS leads with 17.87% vs -3.86% for CCOR. On fees, GGUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GGUS or CCOR?

Over the 1-year period, GGUS has performed better with a 17.87% return vs -3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GGUS or CCOR?

GGUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GGUS or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.43% for GGUS.

What is the main difference between GGUS and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GGUS and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.