GGBZX vs. GCOZX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX).
GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GCOZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001.
Performance
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -3.27% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | -2.61% | 16.13% | 12.05% | 16.57% | -18.06% | 11.60% | 12.96% | 22.39% | -7.50% | 18.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than GCOZX's -2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has outperformed GCOZX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while GCOZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
GGBZX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
GCOZX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GGBZX and GCOZX have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Return for Risk
GGBZX vs. GCOZX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBZX
GCOZX
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBZX | GCOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.48 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 6.04 | -0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBZX | GCOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.65 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.41 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBZX and GCOZX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Dividend Comparison
GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, more than GCOZX's 9.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.96% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | 9.85% | 9.59% | 3.47% | 3.37% | 9.49% | 6.85% | 4.94% | 9.42% | 4.24% | 4.71% | 5.71% | 19.06% |
Drawdowns
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GCOZX's maximum drawdown of -47.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GCOZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBZX | GCOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -47.79% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -9.23% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -25.19% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -27.50% | -5.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -5.91% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -6.56% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.12% | +0.57% |
Volatility
GGBZX vs. GCOZX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) at 5.00%. This indicates that GGBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBZX | GCOZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 5.00% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 7.74% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 12.77% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 11.94% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 12.66% | +3.76% |