GGBZX vs. GGBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX).
GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -3.27% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than GGBFX's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
GGBZX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBZX
GGBFX
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.98 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.06 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 4.31 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.98 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | -0.10 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.43 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.69 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBZX and GGBFX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison
GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.96% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GGBFX's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GGBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -27.03% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -3.80% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -20.84% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -20.97% | -12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -5.48% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -4.64% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 0.94% | +1.75% |
Volatility
GGBZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that GGBZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 1.76% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 2.63% | +7.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 4.00% | +12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 4.91% | +10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 4.49% | +11.93% |