GGBZX vs. GWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX).
GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GWPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012.
Performance
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -2.25% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | -4.53% | 20.47% | 20.17% | 28.76% | -26.97% | 18.59% | 25.34% | 27.19% | -6.59% | 25.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly higher than GWPAX's -4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has underperformed GWPAX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while GWPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
GGBZX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 16.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
GWPAX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -4.53%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GWPAX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBZX vs. GWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBZX
GWPAX
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBZX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.09 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.65 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.80 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 7.18 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBZX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.09 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.67 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.69 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBZX and GWPAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Dividend Comparison
GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than GWPAX's 6.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.84% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | 6.02% | 5.75% | 5.83% | 1.61% | 9.94% | 3.42% | 3.42% | 5.77% | 6.19% | 3.39% | 4.36% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GWPAX's maximum drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBZX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -34.15% | -23.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -11.78% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -34.15% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -34.15% | +1.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -7.74% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -5.77% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.96% | -0.24% |
Volatility
GGBZX vs. GWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) is 6.09%, while American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that GGBZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBZX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 6.56% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 11.34% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 18.91% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 18.17% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 17.95% | -1.53% |