GCOZX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GCOZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
GCOZX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOZX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | -2.61% | 16.13% | 12.05% | 16.57% | -18.06% | 11.60% | 12.96% | 22.39% | -7.50% | 18.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOZX achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOZX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.14%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
GCOZX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOZX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCOZX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GCOZX
VOO
GCOZX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.53 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 1.55 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 7.31 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.71 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.79 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.83 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOZX and VOO is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GCOZX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GCOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | 9.85% | 9.59% | 3.47% | 3.37% | 9.49% | 6.85% | 4.94% | 9.42% | 4.24% | 4.71% | 5.71% | 19.06% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
GCOZX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOZX drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOZX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.79% | -33.99% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -11.98% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -24.52% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.50% | -33.99% | +6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -5.55% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -3.72% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.55% | -0.43% |
Volatility
GCOZX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) is 5.00%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that GCOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOZX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 5.34% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 9.47% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 18.11% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 16.82% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 17.99% | -5.33% |