GGBZX vs. GGEYX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX).
GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GGEYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2001.
Performance
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -3.27% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
GGEYX GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund | -10.89% | 13.18% | 30.51% | 42.26% | -37.71% | 17.77% | 35.74% | 34.83% | 0.77% | 32.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly higher than GGEYX's -10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has underperformed GGEYX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while GGEYX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.
GGBZX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
GGEYX
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- 1Y
- 10.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GGEYX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBZX vs. GGEYX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBZX
GGEYX
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBZX | GGEYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.52 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 0.90 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.62 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 1.93 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBZX | GGEYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.52 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.25 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBZX and GGEYX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Dividend Comparison
GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, less than GGEYX's 15.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.96% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
GGEYX GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund | 15.59% | 13.89% | 13.54% | 4.93% | 6.41% | 20.36% | 15.42% | 10.02% | 19.42% | 10.82% | 4.49% | 22.22% |
Drawdowns
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GGEYX's maximum drawdown of -54.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GGEYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBZX | GGEYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.68% | -54.51% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -18.40% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -49.59% | +21.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.03% | -49.59% | +16.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -15.47% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -11.23% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 5.89% | -3.20% |
Volatility
GGBZX vs. GGEYX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Fund (GGEYX) have volatilities of 6.24% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBZX | GGEYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 6.44% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 12.13% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 21.86% | -5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 24.26% | -8.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 22.27% | -5.85% |