PortfoliosLab logo
GCOZX vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GCOZX and XLK is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GCOZX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GCOZX:

0.86

XLK:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

GCOZX:

1.16

XLK:

0.64

Omega Ratio

GCOZX:

1.17

XLK:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

GCOZX:

0.81

XLK:

0.36

Martin Ratio

GCOZX:

3.59

XLK:

1.12

Ulcer Index

GCOZX:

2.80%

XLK:

8.22%

Daily Std Dev

GCOZX:

12.92%

XLK:

30.48%

Max Drawdown

GCOZX:

-47.67%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

GCOZX:

-0.38%

XLK:

-3.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOZX achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOZX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 6.47%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.88% annualized return.


GCOZX

YTD

4.51%

1M

2.72%

6M

1.69%

1Y

10.39%

3Y*

8.93%

5Y*

8.79%

10Y*

6.47%

XLK

YTD

0.36%

1M

7.54%

6M

-0.94%

1Y

11.62%

3Y*

19.50%

5Y*

19.51%

10Y*

19.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCOZX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCOZX vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOZX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCOZX is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCOZX is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCOZX is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCOZX is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCOZX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCOZX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GCOZX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GCOZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOZX and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GCOZX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

GCOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than XLK's 0.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GCOZX
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund
3.32%3.47%3.37%9.49%6.85%4.93%9.42%4.24%4.71%5.72%19.07%7.32%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.67%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

GCOZX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOZX drawdown since its inception was -47.67%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOZX and XLK.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GCOZX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) is 2.87%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that GCOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...