PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGAL vs. EAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GGAL vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGAL achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GGAL has underperformed EAT with an annualized return of 8.06%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.


GGAL

1D
0.48%
1M
16.22%
YTD
-8.33%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
-8.88%
3Y*
56.36%
5Y*
43.59%
10Y*
8.06%

EAT

1D
4.04%
1M
5.38%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.69%
1Y
-14.86%
3Y*
59.52%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGAL vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGAL
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
-8.33%-11.36%289.05%92.28%8.05%8.88%-45.53%-40.38%-57.85%145.24%
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
1.83%8.49%206.37%35.32%-12.79%-35.32%36.16%-0.92%17.27%-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GGAL and EAT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2000

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGAL:

$1.35B

EAT:

$6.50B

EPS

GGAL:

$676.97

EAT:

$10.14

PE Ratio

GGAL:

0.07

EAT:

14.41

PEG Ratio

GGAL:

0.00

EAT:

0.33

PS Ratio

GGAL:

0.00

EAT:

1.16

PB Ratio

GGAL:

0.00

EAT:

16.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGAL:

$13.01T

EAT:

$5.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGAL:

$5.27T

EAT:

$3.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

GGAL:

$306.88B

EAT:

$807.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGAL vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGAL
GGAL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GGAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGAL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EAT
EAT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGAL vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGALEATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.98

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.34

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

-0.69

+0.33

GGAL vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGAL and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGALEATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-0.32

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.37

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.25

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.28

-0.21

Drawdowns

GGAL vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGAL drawdown since its inception was -98.98%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGAL and EAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGALEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.98%

-88.40%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-44.41%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.94%

-45.92%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.94%

-65.54%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.70%

-84.94%

-6.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.88%

-22.73%

-7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.39%

-24.34%

-33.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.67%

21.68%

+2.99%

Volatility

GGAL vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) is 15.57%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that GGAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGALEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.57%

16.59%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.44%

35.50%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.53%

46.55%

+27.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.39%

48.95%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

55.09%

+6.82%

Dividends

GGAL vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

GGAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.67%3.62%3.46%3.71%2.67%2.50%
GGAL
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
4.41%2.11%3.81%6.49%4.62%0.23%0.94%1.89%1.29%0.16%0.13%0.09%

Financials

GGAL vs. EAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00T0.002.00T4.00T6.00T20222023202420252026
1.99T
1.47B
(GGAL) Total Revenue
(EAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GGAL vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
56.0%
74.6%
Portfolio components
GGAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.11T and revenue of 1.99T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

GGAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported an operating income of 66.60B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

GGAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a net income of 65.18B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGAL and EAT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EAT has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to GGAL (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGAL dropped -98.98% vs EAT's -88.40%.

GGAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGAL and EAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer