PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGAL vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GGAL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGAL achieves a -5.03% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, GGAL has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.83%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.


GGAL

1D
-3.57%
1M
-1.19%
6M
-7.04%
YTD
-5.03%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
51.94%
5Y*
52.58%
10Y*
8.83%
ALL TIME*
5.44%

NVDA

1D
2.93%
1M
3.04%
6M
5.16%
YTD
7.77%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
62.93%
5Y*
59.52%
10Y*
64.62%
ALL TIME*
36.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.55M$50.04M$57.79M
$25.46B$26.13B$31.85B

GGAL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGAL
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
-5.03%-11.36%289.05%92.28%8.05%8.88%-45.53%-40.38%-57.85%145.24%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GGAL and NVDA is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2000

0.23

The correlation between GGAL and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (10 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGAL:

$7.99B

NVDA:

$4.86T

EPS

GGAL:

ARS 741.16

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

GGAL:

99.96

NVDA:

30.73

PEG Ratio

GGAL:

0.91

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

GGAL:

0.66

NVDA:

19.35

PB Ratio

GGAL:

0.24

NVDA:

25.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGAL:

ARS 13.01T

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGAL:

ARS 5.27T

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

GGAL:

ARS 306.88B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGAL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GGAL
GGAL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GGAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GGAL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGALNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.09

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.65

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

1.32

-1.18

GGAL vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGAL and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGAL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGAL drawdown since its inception was -98.98%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGAL and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGALNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.98%

-89.72%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.03%

-20.21%

-29.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.94%

-36.88%

-26.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.94%

-66.34%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.70%

-66.34%

-25.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.35%

-14.74%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.20%

-36.07%

-21.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.31%

9.90%

+13.41%

Volatility

GGAL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) has a higher volatility of 17.30% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that GGAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGALNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.30%

12.04%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.71%

28.30%

+10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.28%

36.41%

+39.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.89%

51.87%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.24%

49.95%

+12.29%

Dividends

GGAL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

GGAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGAL
Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.
3.92%2.11%3.81%6.49%4.62%0.23%0.94%1.89%1.29%0.16%0.13%0.09%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

GGAL vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GGAL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GGAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.11T and revenue of 1.99T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

GGAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported an operating income of 66.60B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

GGAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a net income of 65.18B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGAL and NVDA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGAL has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGAL dropped -98.98% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGAL and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer