GGAL vs. BMA
GGAL (Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.) and BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, GGAL returned 9.37%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for BMA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GGAL vs. BMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGAL achieves a 5.26% return, which is significantly lower than BMA's 13.12% return. Over the past 10 years, GGAL has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 9.37%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.
GGAL
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 31.99%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- 62.39%
- 5Y*
- 48.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
BMA
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 39.94%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 35.44%
- 3Y*
- 79.37%
- 5Y*
- 51.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
GGAL vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 5.26% | -11.36% | 289.05% | 92.28% | 8.05% | 8.88% | -45.53% | -40.38% | -57.85% | 145.24% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 13.12% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | 81.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGAL and BMA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006 | 0.75 |
The correlation between GGAL and BMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.90 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GGAL:
$1.55B
BMA:
$6.31B
GGAL:
ARS 676.97
BMA:
ARS 5.81K
GGAL:
116.68
BMA:
24.33
GGAL:
1.06
BMA:
0.04
GGAL:
0.77
BMA:
1.90
GGAL:
0.26
BMA:
1.54
GGAL:
ARS 13.01T
BMA:
ARS 4.76T
GGAL:
ARS 5.27T
BMA:
ARS 2.84T
GGAL:
ARS 306.88B
BMA:
ARS 751.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGAL vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank
GGAL
BMA
GGAL vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGAL | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 0.75 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.13 | 1.67 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGAL vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGAL drawdown since its inception was -98.98%, which is greater than BMA's maximum drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGAL and BMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGAL | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.98% | -91.66% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.28% | -47.38% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.94% | -65.40% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.94% | -65.40% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.70% | -91.66% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.48% | -8.88% | -10.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.36% | -44.81% | -12.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.18% | 21.97% | +2.21% |
Volatility
GGAL vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) is 17.53%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 18.88%. This indicates that GGAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGAL | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.53% | 18.88% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.08% | 39.66% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.08% | 74.55% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.54% | 59.61% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.01% | 62.37% | -0.36% |
Dividends
GGAL vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison
GGAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than BMA's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 4.84% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 0.00% |
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 3.84% | 2.11% | 3.81% | 6.49% | 4.62% | 0.23% | 0.94% | 1.89% | 1.29% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.09% |
Financials
GGAL vs. BMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GGAL vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison
GGAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.11T and revenue of 1.99T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.
BMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.17T and revenue of 1.91T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
GGAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported an operating income of 66.60B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
BMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 212.69B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GGAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a net income of 65.18B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
BMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 140.24B and revenue of 1.91T, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGAL and BMA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (18.88%) compared to GGAL (17.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGAL dropped -98.98% vs BMA's -91.66%.
BMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGAL and BMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer