GCOW vs. QDPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL).
GCOW and QDPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021.
Performance
GCOW vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOW vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 2.62% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | -4.29% | 16.52% | 22.83% | 23.66% | -16.25% | 8.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's -4.29% return.
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
QDPL
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 15.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOW vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GCOW and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
QDPL
GCOW vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOW | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 0.87 | +1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 1.34 | +1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.20 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.37 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 6.60 | +7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOW | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 0.87 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and QDPL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GCOW vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than QDPL's 5.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.13% | 4.84% | 5.43% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and QDPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -22.59% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -11.94% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -6.08% | +4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -5.30% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.48% | -0.31% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 4.03%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | QDPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 5.30% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 9.39% | -1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 18.01% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 15.12% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 15.12% | +1.13% |