GCOW vs. GFLW
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW).
GCOW and GFLW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. GFLW is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2024. Both GCOW and GFLW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GCOW vs. GFLW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOW vs. GFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | -2.72% |
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -6.62% | 18.40% | -6.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 13.21% return, which is significantly higher than GFLW's -6.62% return.
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
GFLW
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOW vs. GFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GFLW's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. GFLW — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
GFLW
GCOW vs. GFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOW | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 0.87 | +1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 1.37 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 1.40 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 4.72 | +9.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOW | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 0.87 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.12 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and GFLW is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCOW vs. GFLW - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than GFLW's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. GFLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than GFLW's maximum drawdown of -24.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and GFLW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -24.14% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -14.95% | +3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -11.10% | +9.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -4.97% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 4.44% | -2.27% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. GFLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 4.03%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 7.97% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 15.33% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 24.54% | -10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 25.06% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 25.06% | -8.81% |