PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFLW vs. VFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFLW vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFLW vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
-5.18%18.40%-6.12%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
0.86%17.51%-6.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 0.86% return.


GFLW

1D
1.54%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.74%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFLO

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
0.86%
6M
5.82%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFLW vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GFLW and VFLO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


Return for Risk

GFLW vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFLW
GFLW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VFLO
VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFLW vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFLWVFLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

0.89

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.30

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.14

6.09

-0.95

GFLW vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFLW and VFLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFLWVFLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

0.89

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

1.27

-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between GFLW and VFLO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GFLW vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

GFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than VFLO's 1.41% yield.


TTM202520242023
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.01%0.00%
VFLO
Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF
1.41%1.60%1.20%0.71%

Drawdowns

GFLW vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and VFLO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFLWVFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.14%

-17.79%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-13.49%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.74%

-2.19%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-2.52%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.87%

+1.62%

Volatility

GFLW vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Victoryshares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) at 4.27%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFLWVFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

4.27%

+3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

10.21%

+5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.59%

19.67%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

15.75%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

15.75%

+9.31%