GFLW vs. USTB
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB).
GFLW and USTB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFLW is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2024. USTB is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. Both GFLW and USTB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GFLW vs. USTB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFLW vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -6.62% | 18.40% | -6.12% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 0.29% | 6.08% | 0.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 0.29% return.
GFLW
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -8.32%
- 1Y
- 21.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USTB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFLW vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFLW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFLW vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank
GFLW
USTB
GFLW vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFLW | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 3.08 | -2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 4.91 | -3.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.72 | -0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 5.42 | -4.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 24.04 | -19.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFLW | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 3.08 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.70 | -1.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFLW and USTB is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GFLW vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison
GFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than USTB's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
GFLW vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, which is greater than USTB's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and USTB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFLW | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.14% | -5.32% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -0.84% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.10% | -0.65% | -10.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.67% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 0.19% | +4.25% |
Volatility
GFLW vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) at 0.48%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFLW | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 0.48% | +7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 0.83% | +14.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.54% | 1.48% | +23.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 2.01% | +23.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 2.02% | +23.04% |