GFLW vs. MODL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL).

GFLW and MODL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GFLW is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2024. MODL is an actively managed fund by Victory. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022.

Performance

GFLW vs. MODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GFLW vs. MODL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	-6.62%	18.40%	-6.12%
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	-5.81%	18.99%	-3.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than MODL's -5.81% return.

GFLW

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: -5.02%
• YTD: -6.62%
• 6M: -8.32%
• 1Y: 21.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MODL

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -5.37%
• YTD: -5.81%
• 6M: -2.92%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFLW vs. MODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFLW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MODL's 0.46% expense ratio.

MODL

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF

GFLW

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF

Return for Risk

GFLW vs. MODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFLW

GFLW Risk / Return Rank: 49
GFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 58
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFLW vs. MODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFLW	MODL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.95	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	1.46	-0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.22	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	1.52	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	6.60	-1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFLW vs. MODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the MODL Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFLW and MODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFLW	MODL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	0.95	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.33	-1.22

Correlation

The correlation between GFLW and MODL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GFLW vs. MODL - Dividend Comparison

GFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than MODL's 0.76% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.76%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%

Drawdowns

GFLW vs. MODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, which is greater than MODL's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and MODL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFLW	MODL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.14%	-17.60%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	-10.88%	-4.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.10%	-7.03%	-4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.97%	-2.09%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	2.51%	+1.93%

Volatility

GFLW vs. MODL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) at 4.86%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFLW	MODL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	4.86%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.33%	8.66%	+6.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.54%	17.01%	+7.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.06%	14.73%	+10.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.06%	14.73%	+10.33%