PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GARP vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GARP vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 15.59% return.


GARP

1D
1.83%
1M
4.70%
YTD
19.58%
6M
19.30%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
31.52%
5Y*
19.50%
10Y*

MGV

1D
0.19%
1M
4.21%
YTD
15.59%
6M
16.17%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GARP vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
19.58%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
15.59%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GARP and MGV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.59

The correlation between GARP and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GARP vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GARP
MGV

Technology

55.8%
18.5%

Communication Services

11.4%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

7.2%
22.8%

Industrials

6.6%
13.2%

Healthcare

5.3%
16.0%

Energy

2.8%
6.0%

Utilities

1.2%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

11.0%

Technology

GARP
55.8%
MGV
18.5%

Communication Services

GARP
11.4%
MGV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GARP
8.5%
MGV
3.4%

Financial Services

GARP
7.2%
MGV
22.8%

Industrials

GARP
6.6%
MGV
13.2%

Healthcare

GARP
5.3%
MGV
16.0%

Energy

GARP
2.8%
MGV
6.0%

Utilities

GARP
1.2%
MGV
2.3%

Basic Materials

GARP
1.1%
MGV
2.3%

Real Estate

GARP
0.4%
MGV
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

GARP

-

MGV
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GARP vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GARP vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GARPMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.56

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

17.33

-5.49

GARP vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GARP and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GARP vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and MGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GARPMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-56.07%

+24.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.69%

-6.42%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.73%

-13.18%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-16.54%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-0.50%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-7.78%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

1.69%

+1.81%

Volatility

GARP vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 3.21%. This indicates that GARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GARPMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

3.21%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

7.71%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

10.09%

+8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

13.58%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.97%

16.35%

+7.62%

GARP vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GARP vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than MGV's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.84%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GARP and MGV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to MGV (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs MGV's -56.07%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 19.50% vs 13.45% for MGV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.05% for MGV.

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GARP and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer