GARP vs. SPMO
GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GARP returned 19.14%/yr vs 24.25%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GARP charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
GARP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GARP achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 36.08% return.
GARP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 6M
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 42.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 52.78%
- 3Y*
- 44.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
GARP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 19.46% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 36.08% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 24.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between GARP and SPMO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GARP and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
GARP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GARP
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
GARP
SPMO
Communication Services
GARP
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
GARP
SPMO
Financial Services
GARP
SPMO
Industrials
GARP
SPMO
Healthcare
GARP
SPMO
Energy
GARP
SPMO
Utilities
GARP
SPMO
Basic Materials
GARP
SPMO
Real Estate
GARP
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
GARP
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GARP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
GARP
SPMO
GARP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 4.18 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 15.78 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GARP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GARP drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GARP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -30.95% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.69% | -12.70% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.73% | -20.13% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.61% | -22.74% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | 0.00% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -4.59% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GARP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) is 8.09%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that GARP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GARP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 10.55% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 17.11% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 20.05% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 19.77% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 20.55% | +3.41% |
GARP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GARP has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GARP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SPMO's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GARP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to GARP (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GARP dropped -31.34% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.25% vs 19.14% for GARP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GARP.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
GARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GARP and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GARP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer