FXZ vs. ICBMX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX).
FXZ is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Materials Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997.
Performance
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 17.95% | 16.25% | -16.31% | 16.27% | -0.92% | 30.84% | 22.52% | 21.52% | -22.62% | 23.72% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 12.94% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than ICBMX's 12.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed ICBMX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while ICBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.
FXZ
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 6M
- 24.85%
- 1Y
- 39.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
ICBMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 39.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FXZ vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank
FXZ
ICBMX
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXZ | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.23 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.21 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 9.57 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXZ | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.68 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.29 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and ICBMX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than ICBMX's 8.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.52% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.86% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, roughly equal to the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and ICBMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXZ | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -63.92% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | -16.07% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -26.49% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.41% | -48.18% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.10% | -5.72% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -17.98% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 3.70% | +0.55% |
Volatility
FXZ vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) at 6.42%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXZ | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 6.42% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.29% | 15.76% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.42% | 25.02% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 20.85% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 22.28% | +2.51% |