PortfoliosLab logo
ICBMX vs. FNILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ICBMX and FNILX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ICBMX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ICBMX:

-0.19

FNILX:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

ICBMX:

-0.18

FNILX:

1.06

Omega Ratio

ICBMX:

0.98

FNILX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

ICBMX:

-0.21

FNILX:

0.70

Martin Ratio

ICBMX:

-0.65

FNILX:

2.64

Ulcer Index

ICBMX:

8.82%

FNILX:

5.04%

Daily Std Dev

ICBMX:

24.47%

FNILX:

20.01%

Max Drawdown

ICBMX:

-68.23%

FNILX:

-33.75%

Current Drawdown

ICBMX:

-13.98%

FNILX:

-3.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a -6.00% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 1.05% return.


ICBMX

YTD

-6.00%

1M

3.99%

6M

-13.17%

1Y

-4.70%

3Y*

3.62%

5Y*

15.48%

10Y*

3.65%

FNILX

YTD

1.05%

1M

6.61%

6M

-0.82%

1Y

14.12%

3Y*

14.56%

5Y*

15.82%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICBMX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICBMX vs. FNILX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICBMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICBMX is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICBMX is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICBMX is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICBMX is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICBMX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICBMX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNILX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNILX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNILX is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNILX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNILX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNILX is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ICBMX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ICBMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICBMX and FNILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ICBMX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than FNILX's 1.08% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
9.59%9.02%7.07%11.07%1.32%1.09%0.22%0.37%1.38%0.39%1.01%26.01%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
1.08%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ICBMX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and FNILX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ICBMX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 4.81%. This indicates that ICBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...