ICBMX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
ICBMX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on May 4, 1997. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
ICBMX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ICBMX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 15.65% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ICBMX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.20%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
ICBMX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICBMX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ICBMX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
ICBMX
VOO
ICBMX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICBMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.01 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.43 | 1.53 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.55 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 7.31 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICBMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.01 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.79 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.83 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between ICBMX and VOO is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ICBMX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.65% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
ICBMX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICBMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -33.99% | -29.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -11.98% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.49% | -24.52% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.18% | -33.99% | -14.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -5.55% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -3.72% | -14.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.55% | +1.16% |
Volatility
ICBMX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that ICBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ICBMX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 5.34% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 9.47% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.07% | 18.11% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 16.82% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 17.99% | +4.30% |