PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICBMX vs. GOAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
15.65%15.95%21.25%11.02%0.50%30.63%5.53%22.11%-17.38%15.02%
GOAU
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
9.07%126.68%13.78%10.67%-11.66%-9.23%14.13%54.17%-11.88%7.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICBMX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than GOAU's 9.07% return.


ICBMX

1D
2.40%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
15.65%
6M
18.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
14.05%
10Y*
13.20%

GOAU

1D
4.64%
1M
-17.24%
YTD
9.07%
6M
14.84%
1Y
87.28%
3Y*
39.02%
5Y*
20.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICBMX vs. GOAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GOAU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ICBMX vs. GOAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICBMX
ICBMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ICBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ICBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GOAU
GOAU Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GOAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GOAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) and US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICBMXGOAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.88

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.17

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.78

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.22

9.55

+1.66

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the GOAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICBMX and GOAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICBMXGOAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.58

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.50

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between ICBMX and GOAU is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Dividend Comparison

ICBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.65%, more than GOAU's 0.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICBMX
ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund
8.65%10.01%17.24%7.07%11.07%1.32%0.32%1.55%21.58%1.19%0.53%7.78%
GOAU
US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
0.86%0.94%2.11%0.99%1.55%1.28%0.74%0.16%0.47%0.27%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICBMX drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, which is greater than GOAU's maximum drawdown of -55.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICBMX and GOAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ICBMXGOAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.92%

-55.41%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.07%

-31.15%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-48.52%

+22.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-17.43%

+13.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-18.77%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

9.06%

-5.35%

Volatility

ICBMX vs. GOAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) is 6.79%, while US Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that ICBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ICBMXGOAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.79%

17.04%

-10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

39.44%

-23.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

46.73%

-21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

35.96%

-15.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

35.37%

-13.08%