FXZ vs. COPX
FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXZ is a Materials fund tracking the StrataQuant Materials Index, while COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXZ returned 11.46%/yr vs 20.81%/yr for COPX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
FXZ vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.81% annualized return.
FXZ
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
COPX
- 1D
- -6.37%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 92.36%
- 3Y*
- 31.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 20.81%
FXZ vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 24.42% | 16.25% | -16.31% | 16.27% | -0.92% | 30.84% | 22.52% | 21.52% | -22.62% | 23.72% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 10.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and COPX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FXZ and COPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXZ vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXZ
COPX
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
FXZ
COPX
Industrials
FXZ
COPX
Consumer Cyclical
FXZ
COPX
-
Communication Services
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Energy
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Real Estate
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Technology
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Utilities
FXZ
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXZ vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
FXZ
COPX
FXZ vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXZ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 3.34 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 10.16 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXZ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -83.16% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -27.82% | +15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.99% | -39.72% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -42.12% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.41% | -65.41% | +16.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -16.95% | +11.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -39.24% | +27.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 9.12% | -5.68% |
Volatility
FXZ vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 7.83%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXZ | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 19.05% | -11.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.24% | 39.12% | -21.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 44.42% | -21.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 37.03% | -12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 35.74% | -10.81% |
FXZ vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXZ vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than COPX's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.42% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.44% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXZ and COPX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.05%) compared to FXZ (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 20.81% vs 11.46% for FXZ. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 20.81% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.44% for FXZ.
FXZ is categorized as Materials, while COPX is Copper. FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXZ and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer