PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXZ vs. FXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXZ vs. FXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than FXR's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed FXR with an annualized return of 11.46%, while FXR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


FXZ

1D
-2.45%
1M
0.61%
YTD
24.42%
6M
22.36%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
11.46%

FXR

1D
-1.51%
1M
1.86%
YTD
9.23%
6M
7.46%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXZ vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
24.42%16.25%-16.31%16.27%-0.92%30.84%22.52%21.52%-22.62%23.72%
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
9.23%7.56%16.19%26.98%-16.68%25.07%12.82%33.42%-15.12%24.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FXZ and FXR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.81

The correlation between FXZ and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXZ vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXZ
FXR

Basic Materials

76.9%
6.2%

Industrials

15.4%
70.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
7.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

10.3%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Basic Materials

FXZ
76.9%
FXR
6.2%

Industrials

FXZ
15.4%
FXR
70.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FXZ
5.1%
FXR
7.5%

Communication Services

FXZ

-

FXR

-

Consumer Defensive

FXZ

-

FXR

-

Energy

FXZ

-

FXR

-

Financial Services

FXZ

-

FXR
3.4%

Healthcare

FXZ

-

FXR
0.7%

Real Estate

FXZ

-

FXR

-

Technology

FXZ

-

FXR
10.3%

Utilities

FXZ

-

FXR
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXZ vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXZ
FXZ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FXZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXZ vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXZFXRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.51

+2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

4.70

+8.38

FXZ vs. FXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the FXR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and FXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FXR drawdown of -63.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and FXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXZFXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.46%

-63.81%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-13.66%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

-26.65%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.99%

-26.85%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.41%

-44.71%

-4.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-4.67%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-10.34%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.39%

-0.95%

Volatility

FXZ vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) at 6.19%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXZFXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

6.19%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

15.19%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.77%

19.55%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

20.67%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.93%

21.91%

+3.02%

FXZ vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXZ vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than FXR's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.62%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
1.44%1.74%1.81%1.97%1.56%1.11%1.51%1.58%1.38%1.01%1.19%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXZ and FXR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXZ has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to FXR (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs FXR's -63.81%.

On 10-year performance, FXR leads with 13.33% vs 11.46% for FXZ. On fees, FXR is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FXR has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FXR is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.

FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.62% for FXR.

FXZ is categorized as Materials, while FXR is Industrials Equities. FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.64% for FXR.

FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXZ and FXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer