FXZ vs. FXR
FXZ (First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund) and FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FXZ is a Materials fund tracking the StrataQuant Materials Index, while FXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXZ returned 11.46%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for FXR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXZ charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXR.
Performance
FXZ vs. FXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than FXR's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has underperformed FXR with an annualized return of 11.46%, while FXR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.
FXZ
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 22.36%
- 1Y
- 44.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
FXR
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
FXZ vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 24.42% | 16.25% | -16.31% | 16.27% | -0.92% | 30.84% | 22.52% | 21.52% | -22.62% | 23.72% |
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 9.23% | 7.56% | 16.19% | 26.98% | -16.68% | 25.07% | 12.82% | 33.42% | -15.12% | 24.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and FXR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FXZ and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXZ vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXZ
FXR
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
FXZ
FXR
Industrials
FXZ
FXR
Consumer Cyclical
FXZ
FXR
Communication Services
FXZ
-
FXR
-
Consumer Defensive
FXZ
-
FXR
-
Energy
FXZ
-
FXR
-
Financial Services
FXZ
-
FXR
Healthcare
FXZ
-
FXR
Real Estate
FXZ
-
FXR
-
Technology
FXZ
-
FXR
Utilities
FXZ
-
FXR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXZ vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank
FXZ
FXR
FXZ vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXZ | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 1.51 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 4.70 | +8.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FXR drawdown of -63.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and FXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXZ | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -63.81% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -13.66% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.99% | -26.65% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -26.85% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.41% | -44.71% | -4.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -4.67% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -10.34% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.39% | -0.95% |
Volatility
FXZ vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) at 6.19%. This indicates that FXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXZ | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 6.19% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.24% | 15.19% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 19.55% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.19% | 20.67% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 21.91% | +3.02% |
FXZ vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXZ vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than FXR's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.62% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.44% | 1.74% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXZ and FXR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXZ has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to FXR (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXZ dropped -65.46% vs FXR's -63.81%.
On 10-year performance, FXR leads with 13.33% vs 11.46% for FXZ. On fees, FXR is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FXR has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXR is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for FXZ.
FXZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.62% for FXR.
FXZ is categorized as Materials, while FXR is Industrials Equities. FXZ tracks StrataQuant Materials Index, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for FXZ and 0.64% for FXR.
FXZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXZ and FXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer