PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FXZ vs. UYM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FXZUYM
YTD Return-6.05%11.31%
1Y Return8.37%36.72%
3Y Return (Ann)2.07%0.26%
5Y Return (Ann)12.16%13.65%
10Y Return (Ann)8.81%8.42%
Sharpe Ratio0.421.34
Sortino Ratio0.721.84
Omega Ratio1.091.23
Calmar Ratio0.481.09
Martin Ratio1.175.74
Ulcer Index6.86%6.33%
Daily Std Dev19.05%27.12%
Max Drawdown-65.46%-92.77%
Current Drawdown-10.32%-10.85%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FXZ and UYM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FXZ vs. UYM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a -6.05% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 11.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FXZ having a 8.81% annualized return and UYM not far behind at 8.42%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.86%
-1.78%
FXZ
UYM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FXZ vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than UYM's 0.95% expense ratio.


UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
Expense ratio chart for UYM: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FXZ: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FXZ vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FXZ, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FXZ, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FXZ, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FXZ, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FXZ, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.17
UYM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UYM, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UYM, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UYM, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UYM, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UYM, currently valued at 5.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.005.74

FXZ vs. UYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the UYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXZ and UYM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.42
1.34
FXZ
UYM

Dividends

FXZ vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison

FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than UYM's 0.75% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FXZ
First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund
1.56%1.97%1.56%1.11%1.51%1.58%1.38%1.01%1.19%1.26%1.73%0.90%
UYM
ProShares Ultra Basic Materials
0.75%0.28%0.87%0.52%0.56%1.24%0.94%0.38%0.55%0.42%0.42%4.20%

Drawdowns

FXZ vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and UYM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-10.32%
-10.85%
FXZ
UYM

Volatility

FXZ vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 5.94%, while ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.94%
7.49%
FXZ
UYM