FXZ vs. PALL
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL).
FXZ and PALL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXZ is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Materials Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. PALL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. Both FXZ and PALL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXZ or PALL.
Correlation
The correlation between FXZ and PALL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FXZ vs. PALL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FXZ:
-0.85
PALL:
-0.63
FXZ:
-1.10
PALL:
-0.79
FXZ:
0.88
PALL:
0.92
FXZ:
-0.78
PALL:
-0.33
FXZ:
-2.03
PALL:
-1.17
FXZ:
7.80%
PALL:
20.45%
FXZ:
18.67%
PALL:
37.80%
FXZ:
-65.46%
PALL:
-73.63%
FXZ:
-20.29%
PALL:
-71.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXZ achieves a -16.50% return, which is significantly higher than PALL's -17.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FXZ has outperformed PALL with an annualized return of 7.69%, while PALL has yielded a comparatively lower 0.60% annualized return.
FXZ
-16.50%
-10.22%
-12.25%
-16.96%
9.11%
7.69%
PALL
-17.97%
-10.40%
1.39%
-26.79%
-13.80%
0.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXZ vs. PALL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXZ has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PALL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXZ vs. PALL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXZ vs. PALL - Dividend Comparison
FXZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while PALL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXZ First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.56% | 1.11% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.26% | 1.73% | 0.90% |
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXZ vs. PALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXZ drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, smaller than the maximum PALL drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXZ and PALL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXZ vs. PALL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund (FXZ) is 5.74%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that FXZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.